🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to restart nuclear discussions with Washington on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy was effective, and shared fresh requests had come from go-betweens to reopen talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is navigating a difficult route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged stronger militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Concluded

The previous five rounds of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that ended with Donald Trump asserting the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states employed their authority to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the American negotiator only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Status

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if talks restart.

Trump last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the wake of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, intended to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the clash could not be resolved by combat operations. He stated the strikes began with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and cooperation, making faith challenging to reestablish.

Diplomacy Continues the Primary Solution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had always attempted to impose their desires during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and continues the primary answer to settle conflicts, but its standards, regulations and principles must be respected."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the same language."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He continued: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, remains in place. The sites and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the government and the country in the wake of this attack."