🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.